<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dixie Chicks New CD, Taking The Long Way, Breaks Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2006/05/dixie-chicks-new-cd-taking-the-long-way-breaks-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2006/05/dixie-chicks-new-cd-taking-the-long-way-breaks-records/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2006/05/dixie-chicks-new-cd-taking-the-long-way-breaks-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/2006/05/dixie-chicks-new-cd-taking-the-long-way-breaks-records/#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear, this is a press release. And having written more than one press release, I understand about emphasizing the positive and ignoring the negative.

The &quot;record breaking&quot; third #1 debut by a female group is valid (though slice the definition fine enough and everyone is record breaking in something). But the number two album debuted at #1 with sales of 780,000 while this album debuted with 526,000. http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002610727 Rascall Flatts showed that it was certainly possible to debut an album with higher sales in April of this year at 722,000 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rascal_Flatts .

So the record breaking is not at financially successful as their pre- foot insertion/speaking truth to power. The real question is the total sales of the album. The record company doesn&#039;t care if the DC are selling to country music fans or Kos Kids, but they do care about total sales. So if the DC drop like a stone in sales, expect this to be pointed out to artists who may think that insulting their fans is the way to stardom. If the sales remain strong, expect a string of similar episodes, but they likely won&#039;t be as successfull as the &#039;shock value&#039; won&#039;t be as great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear, this is a press release. And having written more than one press release, I understand about emphasizing the positive and ignoring the negative.</p>
<p>The &#8220;record breaking&#8221; third #1 debut by a female group is valid (though slice the definition fine enough and everyone is record breaking in something). But the number two album debuted at #1 with sales of 780,000 while this album debuted with 526,000. <a href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002610727" rel="nofollow">http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002610727</a> Rascall Flatts showed that it was certainly possible to debut an album with higher sales in April of this year at 722,000 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rascal_Flatts" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rascal_Flatts</a> .</p>
<p>So the record breaking is not at financially successful as their pre- foot insertion/speaking truth to power. The real question is the total sales of the album. The record company doesn&#8217;t care if the DC are selling to country music fans or Kos Kids, but they do care about total sales. So if the DC drop like a stone in sales, expect this to be pointed out to artists who may think that insulting their fans is the way to stardom. If the sales remain strong, expect a string of similar episodes, but they likely won&#8217;t be as successfull as the &#8216;shock value&#8217; won&#8217;t be as great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

