working
Gone Hollywood Logo

Pamela Anderson Naked Fur Protest

Pamela Anderson would rather get naked than wear fur. And she’s going to prove it.

Photo Pamela Anderson Naked Fur Protest

Pamela Anderson is planning to strip naked in a shop window – for an anti-fur protest.

The former ‘Baywatch’ babe, famed for her curvy body, is to pose nude in the window of fashion designer Stella McCartney’s London clothes shop on behalf of animal rights group PETA.

Pamela, who is renowned for her work with the group, and Stella, the daughter of former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, are both hopeful the stunt will draw attention to PETA’s campaign to ban the use of fur in fashion.

A source told Britain’s Mail on Sunday newspaper: “This is a cause that Pamela is very passionate about. She wants to support Stella’s fundraising effort for PETA and is in talks to pose naked in her shop window. There will be other models there too, and it should last for about ten minutes.”

While I’m all for Pamela Anderson getting naked as often as possible, thus maximizing her talents to their utmost potential, one can’t help but wonder if this protest wouldn’t be more effective if she didn’t get naked pretty much all the time for any reason whatsoever.

Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover October 1989Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover February 1991Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover July 1992August 1993 (with Dan Aykroyd)Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover  November 1994Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover January 1996

Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover September 1997Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover February 1998Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover June 1998Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover July 2001Pamela Anderson Playboy Cover May 2004

I’m just sayin’.

 
Related Stories:
 
Recent Stories
 
 
| Subscribe to our RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

I guess it depends on what you consider an “effective” protest. Certainly for Pam getting naked doesn’t demonstrate her deep personal conviction to the cause, but that’s probably not why they asked her to do it. If instead the point is simply to draw attention – - media and otherwise – - then it will probably be an “effective” protest by any measure. Her boobs are advertisement, not testimonial.

Posted by Gollum | June 20, 2006 | 04:42 pm | Permalink
 

p.s. I think the February ‘98 cover is the best. Whee!

Posted by Gollum | June 20, 2006 | 04:45 pm | Permalink
 

Just a random thought. If she is against wearing fur would that mean she herself would not be “furry” below the navel?

Posted by yetanotherjohn | June 21, 2006 | 12:37 pm | Permalink
 

I wish JLo would just kick this bitch’s ass!!!

Posted by Steve | August 29, 2006 | 09:34 am | Permalink
 

Kool, Pamela Anderson seems kool! Im happy she duz fings 4 PETA and animals etc etc. Check out P!nk’s anti fur poster, Jodie Marsh’s ‘go veg’ campaign poster and Peaches’ seal cruelty poster!!!! PETA ROCK and so do these wonderful, genuine, powerful, gorgeous, clever women!!! lol alraaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Posted by Leo | August 29, 2006 | 08:47 pm | Permalink
 

P!nk and Jodie Marsh are the best, I love them, Animals Rock, keep fighting for animal rights! J.Lo is an ugly, evil, fur wearing whore!!!

Posted by Leo | September 25, 2006 | 06:32 am | Permalink
 

omg Peaches shes excellent too. Im obsessed with all 3 of em, Pammie’s ok

Posted by Leo | September 25, 2006 | 06:33 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
 


Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.