<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/01/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy-photo-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/01/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy-photo-3/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawke</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/01/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy-photo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-232947</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/michelle_manhart3.jpg#comment-232947</guid>
		<description>Ummm, dumbass, Art133 is for officers.  You cannot charge an enlisted for that.  Get a clue dude.

The most she can get charged with is 134-To the prejudice of good order and discipline.  Of which she cannot be released.  As it is commonly used as a trump charge.

I am curious at how this turns out.  Which charges they will bring her on, if any, but one thing is for certain, armed forces definately are blushing.

Oh and to you Mr 1LT in the Regular Army.  Read up on your crap.  Cause of officers like you, folks get dead.

-Former MP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, dumbass, Art133 is for officers.  You cannot charge an enlisted for that.  Get a clue dude.</p>
<p>The most she can get charged with is 134-To the prejudice of good order and discipline.  Of which she cannot be released.  As it is commonly used as a trump charge.</p>
<p>I am curious at how this turns out.  Which charges they will bring her on, if any, but one thing is for certain, armed forces definately are blushing.</p>
<p>Oh and to you Mr 1LT in the Regular Army.  Read up on your crap.  Cause of officers like you, folks get dead.</p>
<p>-Former MP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/01/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy-photo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-228618</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/michelle_manhart3.jpg#comment-228618</guid>
		<description>Big deal !! This is America. Bet the hypocrits looked at the pictures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big deal !! This is America. Bet the hypocrits looked at the pictures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KoprHED</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/01/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy-photo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-174311</link>
		<dc:creator>KoprHED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/michelle_manhart3.jpg#comment-174311</guid>
		<description>Two words... &quot;Conduct unbecoming&quot; Art 133 of the UCMJ for the 90% non-military in the USA.  This is nothing more than an argument that women should not be in the military.  It is obvious she lacks self-discipline and now those beneath her, the average 18-21 year-old testosterone pump male airmen, will have nothing but &quot;SEX&quot; on their minds when they see her, making them worthless in the workplaceâ?¦

i.e. â??Wow insurgents are shooting at usâ?¦ but SSgt Manhart sure does look good!â??  The military already has a problem with controlling the junior enlisted and officers, THIS DOES NOT HELPâ?¦ AND YES I AM YELLING!!!

Army Officer, 1LT, RA
Prior USAF NCO, 9YRS, TSGT, AD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words&#8230; &#8220;Conduct unbecoming&#8221; Art 133 of the UCMJ for the 90% non-military in the USA.  This is nothing more than an argument that women should not be in the military.  It is obvious she lacks self-discipline and now those beneath her, the average 18-21 year-old testosterone pump male airmen, will have nothing but &#8220;SEX&#8221; on their minds when they see her, making them worthless in the workplaceâ?¦</p>
<p>i.e. â??Wow insurgents are shooting at usâ?¦ but SSgt Manhart sure does look good!â??  The military already has a problem with controlling the junior enlisted and officers, THIS DOES NOT HELPâ?¦ AND YES I AM YELLING!!!</p>
<p>Army Officer, 1LT, RA<br />
Prior USAF NCO, 9YRS, TSGT, AD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 123Fungama : 2800+ posts</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/01/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy/air-force-sergeant-michelle-manhart-in-playboy-photo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-380525</link>
		<dc:creator>123Fungama : 2800+ posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/michelle_manhart3.jpg#comment-380525</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; with numerous photos. She has her clothes on in all of them. [IMG Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 3][IMG Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 2][IMG Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 1]  Okay, so maybe her Air Force affiliation isn’t the only reason Playboy was interested. Still, what was she thinking?&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> with numerous photos. She has her clothes on in all of them. [IMG Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 3][IMG Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 2][IMG Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy Photo 1]  Okay, so maybe her Air Force affiliation isn’t the only reason Playboy was interested. Still, what was she thinking?<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

