working
Gone Hollywood Logo

Film Review: “300″

Reading the reviews of the film 300, you might expect something full of political inference. Is the film pro-Bush? Is it anti-Bush? Is it a fable about Iraq? Perhaps it forefends a war with Iran (modern day Persia, that is)?

The answer is: ‘None of the above! It’s a graphic novel turned into a film, idiot!’

Frank Miller wrote 300 in 1999, before the Iraq war, long before Iran started scaring the bejeebers out of most of the civilized world, before George W. Bush became President.

Miller’s book is not a history of the Persian Wars. It excerpts one event from that lengthy war (which lasted from the turn of the 5th C. BCE to 331 BCE): the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE.

As is the case with much fiction, including graphic novels of course, an historic fact serves as an inspiration for a later work. Miller clearly took historic facts, his considerable graphic skills, and a bit of imagination and compiled them into a creative unity. The result is the book, from which this film is adapted.

Graphic novels are not the place to find great complexity of thought, though there certainly can be depth to them. They seek, however, to simplify complexities into graphics that engage the emotional wiring in the brain. The film certainly succeeds on that count.

 
Related Stories:
 
Recent Stories
 
 
| Subscribe to our RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

I can’t wait for the movie, but “BOOO” to you, author, for the disingenuous use of “BCE” (Before Common Era). As a history major, I have to chide a person who seeks to revise history through such simple - although effective for erasing fact - tactics. You are truly an impotent fallacy.

Posted by MR_Welch | March 9, 2007 | 10:09 pm | Permalink
 

Whatever. I guess you use the Roman calendar too? But which one would that be? The Numa? The Council of Decimvirs? I can’t seem to find an example of the Spartan calendar of the 5th C. BCE.

Archeology and history have moved to using BCE/CE instead of BC/AD. That move took place over 40 years ago. If that offends you, don’t use it.

Do you get grumpy over the metric system, too?

Posted by John Burgess | March 9, 2007 | 11:04 pm | Permalink
 

Just a thought about the women all having apparently sharp (i.e. erect) nipples in the film. Since the film was shot entirely inside a warehouse with green screen, it could be that the conditions were cold, with air conditioners probably blaring all the day. Just a thought.

Posted by yojimbo | March 13, 2007 | 02:34 am | Permalink
 

I read your review but feel like I missed something. It didnt seem you said a lot about the film itself. I am really interested to read other reviews on 300.

Posted by movie fan | August 10, 2007 | 05:56 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
 


Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.