<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rose McGowan &amp; Rosario Dawson &#8211; Naked Butt to Butt &#8211; Picture -1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/04/rose-mcgowan-rosario-dawson-pictured-naked-butt-to-butt-on-rolling-stone/rose-mcgowan-rosario-dawson-naked-butt-to-butt-picture-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/04/rose-mcgowan-rosario-dawson-pictured-naked-butt-to-butt-on-rolling-stone/rose-mcgowan-rosario-dawson-naked-butt-to-butt-picture-1/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:40:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By:  Skinner</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/04/rose-mcgowan-rosario-dawson-pictured-naked-butt-to-butt-on-rolling-stone/rose-mcgowan-rosario-dawson-naked-butt-to-butt-picture-1/comment-page-1/#comment-378338</link>
		<dc:creator> Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/rose.jpg#comment-378338</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; I know, long post title… but it all needed to be there. The cover pictures on Rolling Stone Magazine, certainly have changed. Have they reached the point of what one would consider softcore porn?  [IMG Rose McGowan &amp; Rosario Dawson - Naked Butt to Butt - Picture -1]  That said, the bastardly writes:  [IMG quote-pic]Since when did Rolling Stone Magazine change focus from music to straight-up celebrity softcore porn? Of course we don’t mind the cover, but I’m surprised at how they’re stooping to &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> I know, long post title… but it all needed to be there. The cover pictures on Rolling Stone Magazine, certainly have changed. Have they reached the point of what one would consider softcore porn?  [IMG Rose McGowan &amp; Rosario Dawson - Naked Butt to Butt - Picture -1]  That said, the bastardly writes:  [IMG quote-pic]Since when did Rolling Stone Magazine change focus from music to straight-up celebrity softcore porn? Of course we don’t mind the cover, but I’m surprised at how they’re stooping to <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
