<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cecilia Bolocco Topless Photos 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/05/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/05/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos-1/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:09:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/05/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos-1/comment-page-1/#comment-366587</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 21:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/cecilia-bolocco-topless-photos-1.jpg#comment-366587</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you worry that someone will notice the blatant &lt;strike&gt;hypocrisy&lt;/strike&gt; &quot;irony&quot; of a banner accusing Democrats of robbing our morality on a web page that displays pictures of topless women? Especially topless women who weren&#039;t intending to be photographed? If you wanna look at this kind of thing, that&#039;s your business, but you should probably remove the political references from this section of your blog, especially since most conservatives are not interested in this sort of stuff anyway.

If you are going to turn this into a &quot;conservative&quot; celebrity blog, you should at least try to improve the quality of the posts. For example, stop using slang terms for women&#039;s breasts, and for the love of goodness, stop obsessing over women who accidentally expose themselves! These women are already naked; at least try to save them &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; dignity. There are enough women who expose themselves intentionally for you to keep from stooping to this sort of nonsense. And in much better quality photographs, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you worry that someone will notice the blatant <strike>hypocrisy</strike> &#8220;irony&#8221; of a banner accusing Democrats of robbing our morality on a web page that displays pictures of topless women? Especially topless women who weren&#8217;t intending to be photographed? If you wanna look at this kind of thing, that&#8217;s your business, but you should probably remove the political references from this section of your blog, especially since most conservatives are not interested in this sort of stuff anyway.</p>
<p>If you are going to turn this into a &#8220;conservative&#8221; celebrity blog, you should at least try to improve the quality of the posts. For example, stop using slang terms for women&#8217;s breasts, and for the love of goodness, stop obsessing over women who accidentally expose themselves! These women are already naked; at least try to save them <i>some</i> dignity. There are enough women who expose themselves intentionally for you to keep from stooping to this sort of nonsense. And in much better quality photographs, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
