<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity Beauty Trademarks: Are They Still Hot Without Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/celebrity-beauty-trademarks-are-they-still-hot-without-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/celebrity-beauty-trademarks-are-they-still-hot-without-them/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/celebrity-beauty-trademarks-are-they-still-hot-without-them/comment-page-1/#comment-384811</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/08/celebrity-beauty-trademarks-are-they-still-hot-without-them/#comment-384811</guid>
		<description>Yup,Scarlett needs her boobs, Angelina needs those lips. Cindy is beautiful either way, as Kate is.
Kirsten is trashy either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup,Scarlett needs her boobs, Angelina needs those lips. Cindy is beautiful either way, as Kate is.<br />
Kirsten is trashy either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laliquida</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/celebrity-beauty-trademarks-are-they-still-hot-without-them/comment-page-1/#comment-384613</link>
		<dc:creator>laliquida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/08/celebrity-beauty-trademarks-are-they-still-hot-without-them/#comment-384613</guid>
		<description>Scarlett&#039;s curves and full figure make her hot. She does look weird and forgettable without the clevage, even though I am not a &quot;breast man&quot; per se.  

Angelina Jolie? Wow! She looks totally different and less hot without her full lips.   

Cindy Crawford is the opposite of Kirsten Dunst.  Cindy looks just as good with or without the beauty mark, and Dunst looks just as bad with or without normal teeth.  
 
Kate Walsh&#039;s red hair is hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scarlett&#8217;s curves and full figure make her hot. She does look weird and forgettable without the clevage, even though I am not a &#8220;breast man&#8221; per se.  </p>
<p>Angelina Jolie? Wow! She looks totally different and less hot without her full lips.   </p>
<p>Cindy Crawford is the opposite of Kirsten Dunst.  Cindy looks just as good with or without the beauty mark, and Dunst looks just as bad with or without normal teeth.  </p>
<p>Kate Walsh&#8217;s red hair is hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

