<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links To Hollywood - #63</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leaning Straight Up</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/#comment-385176</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaning Straight Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/#comment-385176</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OJ&#8217;s tacky book:  I&#8217;ll take two...&lt;/strong&gt;

I blogged this not long ago, the tacky book that OJ wrote and the bickering of who gets the money for it if published.&#160; In it I made two observations. 
 
 
  So...let’s suppose OJ&#160;does get&#160;the book published and the book makes 38 Mi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OJ&#8217;s tacky book:  I&#8217;ll take two&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I blogged this not long ago, the tacky book that OJ wrote and the bickering of who gets the money for it if published.  In it I made two observations. </p>
<p>  So&#8230;let’s suppose OJ does get the book published and the book makes 38 Mi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adeline and Hazel</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/#comment-385174</link>
		<dc:creator>Adeline and Hazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/#comment-385174</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Britney Spears&#8217; new look for Elizabeth Arden is Unbelievable...&lt;/strong&gt;


Britney Spears lovely in her new ad for her latest fragrance Believe. She looks svelte, toned and &#8230; clean. She looks so lovely in the ad that fragrance firm Elizabeth Arden has had to release a statement that they didn&#8217;t use a body double....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Britney Spears&#8217; new look for Elizabeth Arden is Unbelievable&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Britney Spears lovely in her new ad for her latest fragrance Believe. She looks svelte, toned and &#8230; clean. She looks so lovely in the ad that fragrance firm Elizabeth Arden has had to release a statement that they didn&#8217;t use a body double&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney Spears’ new look for Elizabeth Arden is Unbelievable &#124; Celebrity Gossip, Rumors and Scandals</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/#comment-385173</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney Spears’ new look for Elizabeth Arden is Unbelievable &#124; Celebrity Gossip, Rumors and Scandals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/08/links-to-hollywood-63/#comment-385173</guid>
		<description>[...] to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate&#8217;s Cove, Dumb Ox Daily News, High Desert Wanderer, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate&#8217;s Cove, Dumb Ox Daily News, High Desert Wanderer, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
