<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Magazine Predicts Our Next President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/05/time-magazine-predicts-our-next-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/05/time-magazine-predicts-our-next-president/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on celebrities.  Especially hot female celebrities.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/05/time-magazine-predicts-our-next-president/#comment-595805</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/05/time-magazine-predicts-our-next-president/#comment-595805</guid>
		<description>I think you're making too early a prediction.  Obama still hasn't undergone the scrutiny accorded one to be the president in a 2-person run-off.  Up till now, he's been the favorite of the Democratic party - and if you think he hasn't had his path strewn with rose petals, you've only been reading US Weekly and People.

This guy, in the short time he's been running for president has either: (1) lied to the U.S. voters or lied to the Canadian public regarding NAFTA; (2) has said he'd legitimize and sit down with terrorist-sponsoring governments; (3) said that he'd send everybody to college for free - forget where the money's going to come from; (4) refused to disavow an avowed America-hater in his reverend until it became a severe political liability for him to continue in their relationship; (5) failed to account for his close-associations with 60s terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn; (6) made even LIBERAL Europeans nervous with his isolation trade rhetoric; (7) called a significant percentage of American voters idiots who "cling to their guns and their gods"; and (8) gotten the support of the terrorist organizations Hamas.

Furthermore, he's spearheaded 0 legislation while in Congress.  He has no experience at all running the most wealthy, strongest, and responsible government in the world - and nothing in his resume points to any insight.  Heck, we're not even sure that he's all that intelligent as he's the product of affirmative action and has been put in positions requiring only color and not intelligence.

He's a throw-back to Chamberlain and better-off with our heads-in-the-sand days.  He's a sure loser in the Presidential race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re making too early a prediction.  Obama still hasn&#8217;t undergone the scrutiny accorded one to be the president in a 2-person run-off.  Up till now, he&#8217;s been the favorite of the Democratic party - and if you think he hasn&#8217;t had his path strewn with rose petals, you&#8217;ve only been reading US Weekly and People.</p>
<p>This guy, in the short time he&#8217;s been running for president has either: (1) lied to the U.S. voters or lied to the Canadian public regarding NAFTA; (2) has said he&#8217;d legitimize and sit down with terrorist-sponsoring governments; (3) said that he&#8217;d send everybody to college for free - forget where the money&#8217;s going to come from; (4) refused to disavow an avowed America-hater in his reverend until it became a severe political liability for him to continue in their relationship; (5) failed to account for his close-associations with 60s terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn; (6) made even LIBERAL Europeans nervous with his isolation trade rhetoric; (7) called a significant percentage of American voters idiots who &#8220;cling to their guns and their gods&#8221;; and (8) gotten the support of the terrorist organizations Hamas.</p>
<p>Furthermore, he&#8217;s spearheaded 0 legislation while in Congress.  He has no experience at all running the most wealthy, strongest, and responsible government in the world - and nothing in his resume points to any insight.  Heck, we&#8217;re not even sure that he&#8217;s all that intelligent as he&#8217;s the product of affirmative action and has been put in positions requiring only color and not intelligence.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a throw-back to Chamberlain and better-off with our heads-in-the-sand days.  He&#8217;s a sure loser in the Presidential race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anything Hollywood&#8217;s TGIF Hot Gossip Links! &#183; anythinghollywood.com</title>
		<link>http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/05/time-magazine-predicts-our-next-president/#comment-595751</link>
		<dc:creator>Anything Hollywood&#8217;s TGIF Hot Gossip Links! &#183; anythinghollywood.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/05/time-magazine-predicts-our-next-president/#comment-595751</guid>
		<description>[...] Time magazine predicts our next president! Barack Obama - Gone Hollywood [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time magazine predicts our next president! Barack Obama - Gone Hollywood [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
