Comments on: Celebrity Photoshop Gone Wrong http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/08/celebrity-photoshop-gone-wrong/ News and commentary on celebrities. Especially hot female celebrities. Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:28:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Stephanie http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/08/celebrity-photoshop-gone-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-637950 Stephanie Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:50:22 +0000 http://gone-hollywood.com/?p=16975#comment-637950 I think with the Jolie-Pitt babies, the problem was that the two magazines used the exact same shot, however, in one of the mags the baby appears to be smiling, but not in the other IDENTICAL photo. So sketchy when even BABIES need to be retouched. Good lord. I agree with James - a lot of them look better au naturel. Society has sooo screwed ourselves with the unreal expectations and images we feed off of in these magazines and ads. I think with the Jolie-Pitt babies, the problem was that the two magazines used the exact same shot, however, in one of the mags the baby appears to be smiling, but not in the other IDENTICAL photo.

So sketchy when even BABIES need to be retouched. Good lord.

I agree with James – a lot of them look better au naturel. Society has sooo screwed ourselves with the unreal expectations and images we feed off of in these magazines and ads.

]]> By: James Joyner http://gone-hollywood.com/2008/08/celebrity-photoshop-gone-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-637933 James Joyner Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:33:57 +0000 http://gone-hollywood.com/?p=16975#comment-637933 What's odd is that several of the stars look better in their natural state. Kate Hudson, especially, looks like some creepy zombie on the "W" cover and great in the other shot. Mila Jovovich, though, definitely looks better lightened! What’s odd is that several of the stars look better in their natural state. Kate Hudson, especially, looks like some creepy zombie on the “W” cover and great in the other shot.

Mila Jovovich, though, definitely looks better lightened!

]]>