After coming across these photos of Karissa and Kristina Shannon, I can now see why exactly Hugh Hefner dumped their ass.
On top of how stupid they both act, the fact that they would show up to an event at the Playboy Mansion (or anywhere at all including a McDonalds) would be enough to make me dump anybody. Even if they were twins who would do anything in bed.
It’s not even the clothes that bother me it’s that ratty hair they have going on, they both just look dirty and they always look bloated in the face. Maybe I’m too picky?
[Click thumbnails for larger view]
source: So That’s What Hef Saw In These Two [Dlisted]
In Hollywood, it is commonplace for shy stars to use a body double for a sex scene. But while Megan Fox happily went naked in her latest film Jennifer’s Body, it appears she isn’t quite so confident with her hands.
In her latest role, starring in a one-off Super Bowl advert for Motorola, it appears the actress has enlisted a hand double.
In the Motorola ad screened yesterday, a naked Megan Fox reclines in a bubblebath with some strategically placed suds protecting her modesty. But while her sexy pouting caught a lot of attention, other viewers were more concerned with the fact her ‘hands’ didn’t belong to her.
In the commercial, a totally different woman’s fingers are seen playing with the phone during the close-up.
The actress has a genetic condition called brachydactyly, which means she has clubbed thumbs. So rather than use her actual thumbs for the close-up on the new Blur smart phone, Motorola enlisted a hand model.
I wonder if she was concerned, or Motorola?
source: Megan Fox enrols a ‘hand double’ as she peels off for sexy Super Bowl advert [daily mail]
If you thought you’d had a few too many beers seeing Jay Leno, Oprah Winfrey, and David Letterman all sharing a sofa during a Super Bowl commercial, don’t worry. It really did happen!
The spot, a commercial for The Late Show, is the biggest TV ad shocker of the Super Bowl, surpassing Tim Tebow with ease.
Letterman and Leno snipe at each other with mock-annoyance, with Dave mimicking Leno’s high-pitched voice. Oprah tries to calm the boys.
Now this is damage control for Leno: Agreeing to appear in a CBS Late Show ad while he’s still finishing out his NBC 10 p.m. show is the coolest thing Jay has done in… ages.
If it also makes Dave the publicity victor — after all, it is a commercial for his show, not the Leno Tonight Show — you have to hand it to Jay for playing along, probably as a slap at the way NBC handled the whole Tonight Show mess.
Now you’ve seen it: What do you think?
source: How the Letterman-Oprah-Leno Super Bowl Ad Came Together [ny times]
Viewers in Tucson, Ariz., got an eyeful — of male porn — when they expected to be watching the Super Bowl on Sunday.
Station airs porn instead of Super Bowl
KVOA confirmed that about 10 seconds of pornographic video was fed to customers instead of the Super Bowl just after the Cardinals took a 23-20 lead in the fourth quarter. The incident appeared to have been isolated to Comcast customers.
“I just figured it was another commercial until I looked up,” Cora King told the Arizona Daily Star. “Then he did his little dance with everything hanging out.”
KVOA said there was no pornography in the game’s feed when the station dispensed the signal to cable providers.
Comcast said it was investigating “investigating why there was an interruption in the feed of the Super Bowl.”
The U.S. government’s campaign against television indecency was dealt a blow on Monday when a court overturned a $550,000 fine against CBS Corp television stations for airing a glimpse of pop singer Janet Jackson’s breast during the 2004 Super Bowl broadcast. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said the Federal Communications Commission had “arbitrarily and capriciously departed from its prior policy” that exempted fleeting broadcast material from actionable indecency violations.
Jackson’s right breast was exposed to almost 90 million TV viewers for a fraction of a second during the live 2004 Super Bowl football halftime show in what fellow pop singer Justin Timberlake later called a “wardrobe malfunction.” Timberlake ripped off part of Jackson’s bustier exposing Jackson’s breast during the show. Despite the brevity, lawmakers and regulators were outraged and vowed a crackdown on broadcast indecency.
The judges rejected the FCC’s argument that the “fleeting” policy had only applied to words, not images. “Like any agency, the FCC may change its policies without judicial second-guessing. But it cannot change a well- established course of action without supplying notice of and a reasoned explanation for its policy departure,” Chief Judge Anthony Scirica wrote for the three-judge panel that heard the case.
[...]
The decision got a sharp rebuke from the Parents Television Council, an indecency watchdog group. It said the ruling “borders on judicial stupidity” and urged lawmakers in Congress to pass a bill to strengthen anti-indecency enforcement. “If a striptease during the Super Bowl in front of 90 million people, including millions of children, doesn’t fit the parameters of broadcast indecency, then what does?” the group asked.
But, of course, it wasn’t a “striptease” but rather an instantaneous “Did I just see what I thought I saw?!” moment. And, while I don’t believe for a moment that Jackson and/or Timberlake didn’t plan the incident to generate precisely the buzz they got, it’s simply bizarre to fine CBS for airing something that happened outside their control during a live broadcast.
Steven Taylor, whose post on the subject is entitled “Janet Jackson’s Right Breast Ruled Constitutional,” guesses this will be appealed to the Supreme Court. Too bad we don’t Potter Stewart isn’t around any more.
